Assignment
The New Literature
Name : Virani Dhara R.
Course : M. A. English
Semester : 4
Roll No : 4
Submitted to: Smt. S. B. Gardi Department of English
Subject: The New Literature
Topic: # A study of Memory and Psychological Defense Mechanism in Julian Barnes' The Sense of an Ending:
# Introduction:
The Sense of an Ending, which is divided into two parts, portrays a man in his sixties who is remembering or rather, constructing memories from his youth in the first part, and deconstructing the very same memories in the second part. Through his unreliable narrator, Julian Barnes (2011) poses questions regarding imperfections of memory and self-delusion. As Tony Webster, the narrator of the novella admits, It strikes me that this may be one of the differences between youth and age: when we are young, we invent different futures for ourselves; when we are old, we invent different pasts for others.
Thus, the novella demonstrates the imperfections of memory and how the human mind distorts facts. Barnes indeed succeeds in creating a narrative which “underscores the ways people try to erase or edit their youthful follies and disappointments”
# Perception s and memories:
Several factors affect our perceptions and memories, one of which is the application of psychological defense mechanisms. When applied wisely, psychological defense mechanisms protect the individual from unwanted emotions which threaten the individual’s well-being. They “allow individuals to reduce cognitive dissonance and to minimize sudden changes in internal and external environments”
However, these mechanisms can be hazardous if an individual goes to extremes in applying them, in which case they downright distort his perception of reality. In The Sense of an Ending, Tony deploys certain psychological defense mechanisms which distort his account of reality. When faced with documentations from past, he realizes how distorted and fallacious his account of reality has been and he is forced to pass moral judgments on his own character which eventually makes him feel guilty and remorseful for the damage that he caused a long time ago, “Too much time has passed, too much damage has been done, for amends to be made"
# A study of Memory and Psychological Defense Mechanism in Julian Barnes' The Sense of an Ending:
METHODOLOGY
Although a significant novella about memory and its imperfections, the critique on The Sense of an Ending has so far been limited to insubstantial reviews. The present paper aims to render an in-depth, psychological analysis in order to illuminate the intricate workings of the protagonist’s mind. Accordingly, the psychological defense mechanisms deployed by the protagonist which blur his perception of reality and eventually inflict great pain on him will be investigated in light of psychological and psychiatric findings.
# MEMORY AND HISTORY
Memory and History In The Sense of an Ending, Julian Barnes tells the story of Tony Webster, an ordinary man in his sixties who has led a conventional life and is now basking in the idle days of retirement. This is all until he finds out that the mother of his college girlfriend, Veronica, has bequeathed him both £500 and the diary of his high school friend, Adrian. Startled by this unexpected call from the past, Tony is forced to go back in time and examine the course of his life. In the process of completing the puzzle of his past, Tony has to face unresolved issues which he has completely banished from his consciousness. He has to find answers to unresolved questions in his past, questions that he thought he had solid answers for. However, Tony finds it utterly difficult to make sense of his past. He is fairly aware that his memories are tampered with through the years and are not reliable; history is after all “that certainty produced at the point where the imperfections of memory meet the inadequacies of documentation” (Barnes, 2011, p. 17). Therefore, he pesters Veronica to hand over Adrian’s diary, hoping that its contents might shed light on the dark holes in his past. Tony is aware that his account of reality is tarnished with fallacy. He admits that it is not possible to remember the past as it really happened, “What you end up remembering isn't always the same as what you have witnessed” (Barnes, 2011, p. 4). As an unreliable narrator, Tony is sincere in that he knows what he remembers is probably tarnished by fallacy and self-serving adjustments. “How often do we tell our own life story? How often do we adjust, embellish, make sly cuts?” (Barnes, 2011, p. 89). What he does not know, however, is the extent that he has unconsciously tampered with reality. As mentioned by the psychologist Elizabeth Loftus (1991), our memories are stored in densely packed mental drawers in our brain, “They are also constantly being emptied out, scattered about, and then stuffed back into place” (p. 27). As we remember our memories, we add little details and delete “confusing or extraneous elements”
# A Study of Memory and Psychological Defence Mechanism:
A Study of Memory and Psychological Defense Mechanism in Julian Barnes’s The Sense of an Ending 274 Walter Menninger (1995), our memories are not completely reliable and what we remember may be “more wishful thinking than true reality” (p. 104). In his book on imperfections of memory, Goleman (1998) refers to the "double jeopardy" of memory, Memory is attention in the past tense: what you remember now is what you noticed before. Memory is in double jeopardy, for apart from an initial skew in what is noticed, there can be later biases in what is recalled. (p. 95) Goleman (1998) emphasizes that information is not simply transmitted as it passes through the mind, it is rather transformed. As he reaffirms, “The mind takes in, uses, and stores information while it is prone to bias by the trade-off between anxiety and attention” (p. 58). Anxiety is of key importance in this process; our mind alters disturbing pieces of information which may create anxiety. To do so, it deploys psychological defense mechanisms. In The Sense of an Ending, Tony’s excessive use of certain psychological defense mechanisms distorts his memories harshly. In the following parts, the authors will try to give a clear picture of how he deploys these mechanisms in the course of remembering his past, and how the maladaptive use of these mechanisms leads to great feelings of anxiety in him. Freud who first introduced these mechanisms calls them “ego mechanisms of defense,” however, they are also called “adaptive mechanisms” and “defense mechanisms” by other psychologists and psychiatrists. Drawing on the work of George E. Vaillant (1977) and George E. Vaillant (1994), these mechanisms will likewise be referred to as “defense mechanisms”. 4.2 Memory and Psychological Defense Mechanisms As Vaillant (1994) points out, defense mechanisms can “alter our perception of any or all of the following: subject (self), object (other), idea, or feeling” (p. 44). Generally, defense mechanisms are used by the mind in order to “make life tolerable” (Vaillant, 1977, p. 16), and they also account for self-preserving interpretations and biased remembering of the past. According to W. Walter. Menninger (1995), defense mechanisms make us “remember the past events unreliably” (p. 97). They allow us to remember a past that does not wound our self-image, “What you remember is consistent with what should have happened in light of your current self-portrait” (Allen, 1995, p. 102). It should be noted that defense mechanisms are not always harmful. In fact, in most cases, these adaptive defenses are necessary for keeping one healthy. As stated by Vaillant (1977), “healthy” defense mechanisms “contribute to the continued development of the individual” (p. 86). He further explains that mature defenses are generally adaptive whereas immature defenses are generally maladaptive. In his opinion, defense mechanisms can be maladaptive in the following circumstances: If a defense is used in a rigid, inflexible way, if it is motivated more by past needs than by present and future reality, if it too severely distorts the present situation, if it abolishes rather than limits gratification, or if it dams rather than rechannels the expression of feelings, then it is likely to be maladaptive. (p. 85) In the Sense of an Ending, Tony deploys “immature” and “neurotic” defense mechanisms as he tries to make sense of his past. As it turns out by the end of the novel, the defense mechanisms deployed by him are maladaptive. These mechanisms suit to justify his past for him and make it bearable for him to deal with his present, distort the past so strongly that his present is influenced, and are repressive in nature. Tony, however, is not aware of the great extent that he has tempered with reality. Psychological defense mechanisms work at an almost unconscious level. They are neither “conscious avoidance of problems,” nor do they entail “willpower.” “They rather facilitate “a far subtler and almost entirely unconscious processes” (Vaillant, 1977, p. 8). Almost oblivious to the tricky workings of his mind, Tony is manipulated by the tricks his mind plays in order to avoid anxiety. Tony has unconsciously tried to hide some truths from his past.
# Conclusion:
Barnes’s The Sense of an
Julian Barnes’s The Sense of an Ending is a notable example of how the imperfections of memory and the self-delusion resulted from psychological defense mechanisms can sabotage one's life. Tony Webster often tends to take the reliability of his memories for granted. He builds his whole future based on how he defines his past, oblivious to the fact that “our life is not our life, merely the story we have told about our lives.
References
Barnes, Julian. (2011). The Sense of an Ending. Pdf. Retrieved from https://bok.cc/book/1177814/736cea
Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness, and the Expert Who Puts Memory on Trial,Article:Dec 1993AM J PSYCHOL,Willem A. WagenaarElizabeth LoftusKatherine Ketcham
No comments:
Post a Comment