#Workshop on Source Education Evaluation Rubric (SEER) #
Hello Readers!
I am the student of English language and literature, on 19th November the workshop on SEER was organized at Department of English Mkbu university by the head of the English department Dr. Dilip Barad. It was really fruitfulness and beneficial for the students.
" The internet has changed the very meaning of 'research' "
As we know that 21st century known as the Digital World, in education system it's takes a huge role. In a recently report entitled, "How Teens Do Research in the Digital World", the pew Research center confirms what many educators already know;student reliance on Internet-based search has replaced the more rigorous and traditional approaches to research, in short, what constitutes " Research " for students today has come to mean "Googling".
#Student 'Research' in the Digital Age
In Digital age , there should be required to " Excellent " The ability of students ' to recognize bias in online content. 'As for their " ability to assess the quality and accuracy of information they find online, ' only three percent reported that they found students to be " Excellent ".
# Evaluating Online Sources
The source Educational Evaluation Rubric (SEER) represents the evolution of the critical approach that Turntin has adopted and used to categorize websites in our analysis of student sources.
The rubric is built on five criteria:
# Authority Is the site well regarded ,cited, and written by experts in the field?
#Educational value: Does the site content help advance educational goals?
#Intent: Is the site a well-respected source of content intended to inform users?
#Originality: is the site a source of original content and viewpoints?
#Quality: Is the site highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area?
SEER worksheet in the appending
3.0-4.0: highly credible, quality sources
2.0-3.0:credible sources
1.0-2.0: questionable sources
0.0-1.0: unacceptable or inappropriate sources.
Three Web resources occasionally used by students for academic purpose.
#www.esquire.com
Authoritative : 3,
Educational value : 2
Intent : 1
Originality : 2
Quality : 3
In this web resource we can find that this site is well cited and referenced, and also has some instructions goals, and this site also informed the users
# www.sparknotes.com.
Authoritative : 4
Educational value : 3
Intent : 3
Originality : 3
Quality : 4
This web is highly regarded sited and well authorized and written by author. Educational value is that to well informed the users.
# www.medium.com
Authoritative : 3
Educational value : 2
Intent : 2
Originality : 3
Quality : 3
This site is well known for its well offered the reference and information. And also the good quality. The originality of this site is that of it is offer of some original content.
In short , through this workshop we are able to findfind well web resources though this five criteria, and learn so many things which is really fruitfulness and helpful us.
Thank you. .. .
" The internet has changed the very meaning of 'research' "
As we know that 21st century known as the Digital World, in education system it's takes a huge role. In a recently report entitled, "How Teens Do Research in the Digital World", the pew Research center confirms what many educators already know;student reliance on Internet-based search has replaced the more rigorous and traditional approaches to research, in short, what constitutes " Research " for students today has come to mean "Googling".
#Student 'Research' in the Digital Age
In Digital age , there should be required to " Excellent " The ability of students ' to recognize bias in online content. 'As for their " ability to assess the quality and accuracy of information they find online, ' only three percent reported that they found students to be " Excellent ".
# Evaluating Online Sources
The source Educational Evaluation Rubric (SEER) represents the evolution of the critical approach that Turntin has adopted and used to categorize websites in our analysis of student sources.
The rubric is built on five criteria:
# Authority Is the site well regarded ,cited, and written by experts in the field?
#Educational value: Does the site content help advance educational goals?
#Intent: Is the site a well-respected source of content intended to inform users?
#Originality: is the site a source of original content and viewpoints?
#Quality: Is the site highly vetted with good coverage of the topical area?
SEER worksheet in the appending
3.0-4.0: highly credible, quality sources
2.0-3.0:credible sources
1.0-2.0: questionable sources
0.0-1.0: unacceptable or inappropriate sources.
Three Web resources occasionally used by students for academic purpose.
#www.esquire.com
Authoritative : 3,
Educational value : 2
Intent : 1
Originality : 2
Quality : 3
In this web resource we can find that this site is well cited and referenced, and also has some instructions goals, and this site also informed the users
# www.sparknotes.com.
Authoritative : 4
Educational value : 3
Intent : 3
Originality : 3
Quality : 4
This web is highly regarded sited and well authorized and written by author. Educational value is that to well informed the users.
# www.medium.com
Authoritative : 3
Educational value : 2
Intent : 2
Originality : 3
Quality : 3
This site is well known for its well offered the reference and information. And also the good quality. The originality of this site is that of it is offer of some original content.
In short , through this workshop we are able to findfind well web resources though this five criteria, and learn so many things which is really fruitfulness and helpful us.
Thank you. .. .
No comments:
Post a Comment